"If Zarqawi and bin Laden gain control of Iraq, they would create a new training ground for future terrorist attacks," Bush said. "They'd seize oil fields to fund their ambitions. They could recruit more terrorists by claiming a historic victory over the United States and our coalition."(George Bush, August 30, 2005 in San Diego.)
So it is official, Casey had his blood shed in Iraq for OIL. He died so we could pay over 3.00/gallon for gas. Like I suspected all along, my dear, sweet son: almost 1900 others; and tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis died so the oil fields wouldn't "fall into the hands of terrorists" and so George and his immoral band of greedy robber barons could become wealthier. Like I have said all along: how can these people sleep at night and how can they choke down their food knowing it is purchased off of the flesh and blood of others? We have found our "Noble Cause." And it is OIL. This man and his handlers need to be stopped.
I thought we went to Iraq for cheap oil? Regardless, is she really so emotionally distraught that she doesn't understand Bush's statement? Or is she being willfully disingenuous? Perhaps it was the sun. If she can't understand the danger of terrorists controlling oil wells, then the conversation is just over. But, really, I'm curious. Is her misunderstanding of Bush's statement intentional, or is she just ... challenged by it?
Posts
|